Research Explorer

Your browser does not support JavaScript or JavaScript is not enabled. Without JavaScript some functions of this webapplication may be disabled or cause error messages. To enable JavaScript, please consult the manual of your browser or contact your system administrator.

Project

Strengthening the European Court of Human Rights: More Accountability through Better Legal Reasoning (ECHR)

Outputs and Outcomes

Code

05Z40009

Duration

01 October 2009 → 30 September 2019

Funding

Ghent University funding, Regional and community funding: Special Research Fund

Promotor

Eva Brems

Fellow

Eva Brems

Research disciplines

Social sciences
- Law

Keywords

legal reasoning human rights European Courth of Human Rights comparative research

Project description

The project analyses the legal reasoning of the European Court of Human Rights regarding three sub-themes: mainstreaming diversity, settling the minimum-maximum debate and doing justice in cases of conflicting rights. The objective of the research is the proposal of innovative solutions to strengthen the consistency and persuasiveness of the Court’s legal reasoning so as to improve its accountability and transparency.

English

Dutch

English

Cookie settings

In addition to functional cookies which are necessary for the website to function, Ghent University uses non-functional cookies such as statistical cookies and social media cookies. These non-functional cookies can also be placed by third parties, for example to measure the use of the site or to share content on social media. Certain media are only available if you accept the cookies. You can set and modify your cookie preferences yourself. Find out what cookies we use and why in the Cookie Statement.

Analytics

AnalyticsWe'll collect information about your visit to our site. It helps us understand how the site is used – what's working, what might be broken and what we should improve.

Powered by