Research Explorer

Your browser does not support JavaScript or JavaScript is not enabled. Without JavaScript some functions of this webapplication may be disabled or cause error messages. To enable JavaScript, please consult the manual of your browser or contact your system administrator.

Project

Legislating with the best intentions? Judicial review of the legitimacy of the legislator's aims

Outputs and Outcomes

Publications

Verwijzingen naar het Grondwettelijk Hof in het parlementair werk : een verkenning

Tobias MortierToon Moonen

Bookchapter in Parlementaire soevereiniteit : een constitutionele utopie?

Lenis v. Greece : extreme homophobia not protected under freedom of expression

Lenis t. Griekenland (EHRM, 47833/20) : extreme homofobie niet beschermd onder vrijheid van meningsuiting

A4 Journal Article in EHRC. EUROPEAN HUMAN RIGHT CASES UPDATES

Defending human rights as a threat to national security? The perverse consequences of ignoring the legitimate aim question in Kogan and Others v. Russia

Hoe een sprookjesboek kan leiden tot meer bescherming voor LGB-personen

Reprehensible or legitimate aims? A proposal for a new approach to Article 18 ECHR in light of its predominance test

A2 Journal Article in EUROPEAN CONVENTION ON HUMAN RIGHTS LAW REVIEW

Macatė t. Litouwen (EHRM, 61435/19) : homofobie als grond van illegitimiteit

A4 Journal Article in EHRC. EUROPEAN HUMAN RIGHT CASES UPDATES

How far is the ECtHR willing to go to accommodate the legislature regarding retrospectivity? The case of Vegotex International S.A. v. Belgium

The Belgian Constitutional Court's heightened scrutiny in respect of aims pursued through retrospective legislative regularization

Taner Kılıç v. Turkey (no. 2) : Court, don’t disregard Article 18 all too easily!